| 2003 SB&D Investment 100
Investment 100 Tumbles, But Avoids Record Low
High Quality, High Tech Manufacturing Grabs a Big Foothold
in the South
By Lee Burlett
If there is anything positive about this year's SB&D
100, it's the fact that the 2003 SB&D Investment 100,
Part II of our annual ranking, didn't set record lows like
the 2003 Job 100. Granted, this year's Investment 100 was
the worst overall performance since 1994 and the $50 million
threshold ties the lowest mark ever.
But all is not lost. At least we got rid of most of those
pesky, phantom power plants. Only nine announced power plants
made this year's I-100 compared to 37 last year and 27 the
year before. Unfortunately for the South and for the counties
where they were to be built, most of those power plants announced
in 2000 and 2001 won't break ground any time soon, if ever.
Therefore, this collection of large investments may be more
real and accurate than when the power plant frenzy broke out
in 1998. Still, a drop from last year's $78 million threshold,
only the third decrease in any Investment 100 year, to this
year's $50 million threshold is without question a cause for
alarm.
The last three years of the Investment 100 saw thresholds
of $80 million, $80 million and $78 million. To fall to $50
million in calendar year 2002 indicates a sharp drop in total
investment generated by the Investment 100. The grim reality
is that this year's I-100 generated but $18.3 billion in investments
compared to $25 billion last year. Again, if you read the
Job 100, the national media has generally depicted that 2001
was the recession year and 2002 was labeled the "recovery"
year. In regards to the South's economy, nothing could be
further from the truth. Calendar year 2002 was far and away
a much more disappointing year than 2001 on the job and investment
front in the South.
The last time the SB&D Investment 100, the 100-largest
investment deals announced in the South the previous calendar
year, totaled less than $18.3 billion was in 1994 when the
world's corporate elite spent $17.4 billion in the nation's
most active corporate and industrial dealmaking region. The
all time low was $15.5 billion in 1993.
Furthermore, the last time the Investment 100 could muster
but a puny $50 million threshold was in 1995, the same threshold
seen in 1994 and 1993. As mentioned, the highest thresholds
produced were in 2000 and 2001 with $80 million each ($25.75
billion and $24.97 billion totals respectively). But those
two-year rankings were greatly populated by power plants that
may never materialize.
Chart No. 1
SB&D Investment 100 1993-2003
Investment Total Threshold
1993 $15.5 Billion
$50 Million
1994 $17.4 Billion
$50 Million
1995 $18.8 Billion
$50 Million
1996 $22.6 Billion
$68 Million
1997 $23.8 Billion
$72 Million
1998 $19.8 Billion
$70 Million
1999 $22.6 Billion
$75 Million
2000 $24.6 Billion
$80 Million
2001 $25.8 Billion
$80 Million
2002 $25.0 Billion
$78 Million
2003 $18.3 Billion
$50 Million
Some Excellent Deals Making This Year's List
At the top of the 2003 Investment 100 is ... uh, a $2 billion
power plant. As far as we know, this one in Kentucky is for
real. But if you look at the top 10 investment deals announced
in the South in 2002, you'll clearly see that some of the
world's most recognizable manufacturers are spending some
big bucks in the South.
At the No. 2 spot is LES, Inc. Who, you might ask? Louisiana
Energy Services is a partnership of Duke Energy, Entergy,
Excelon, Canadian-based Cameco and Urenco, a European concern.
The LES deal is a $1.1 billion uranium enrichment facility
being built on a site in Hartsville, Tenn., owned by the Tennessee
Valley Authority.
Following LES, the list settles to the familiar: Hyundai,
Citgo, Nissan, Honda, Saturn, Eli Lilly and BMW. Are those
deals announced by that list of power players solid as gold?
You betcha! Together, those nine investment deals total nearly
$4 billion and they represent just three industries that you
will be hearing from with regularity in the South in coming
years. In terms of mass investments, automotive and biotech
are the South's future. Oil and gas will always be a player
in the South's economy until that resource is depleted.
Other major players who decided last year that the South
was their kind of place to invest hundreds of millions of
dollars include ExxonMobil, Williams International, J P Morgan
Chase, Procter & Gamble, Dow Chemical, Nucor, Robert Bosch,
Volvo, Citigroup, Oracle, Perrier, Samsung, Wyeth Biopharma,
International Paper, Coca Cola, Goodyear ... well, we could
go on forever. Just read the list.
New vs. Expanded
This year's top investment deals announced in the South include
39 new and 65 expanded projects. Unlike this year's SB&D
Job 100, where new deals exceeded expansions, the SB&D
Investment 100 acted more like a year when the economy isn't
growing. With this type of economy, you are almost always
going to see many more expansions than new projects. Last
year, 51 new deals made the Investment 100 with 49 expansions.
The year before there were 41 new deals and 59 expansions.
Industry Trends
Because of their capital intensive nature, the manufacturing
sector has always dominated the SB&D Investment 100. But
this year's crop of big investments leaned toward the manufacturing
side like no other year. In fact, 83 manufacturers made this
year's top 100 investment deals compared to 21 big service
deals making the list. That's the largest number of manufacturers
represented on any SB&D Investment 100 since it was first
published in 1993.
Is manufacturing coming back in the South? This year's SB&D
100 indicates that manufacturing is not only coming back,
the results from calendar year 2002 screams that manufacturing
is returning with a vengence. This year's SB&D Job 100
saw nearly 50 percent of its deals come from the manufacturing
sector when just 15 percent of the list was represented by
manufacturing in the 2002 Job 100. Add to that the largest
representation in the 11-year history of the SB&D Investment
100 and clearly you have a situation where manufacturing is
blooming again in the American South.
But not only do the results of this year's SB&D 100 show
manufacturing returning in huge volumes to the South, it's
the quality of those deals that's important. Gone are the
potential jack-leg deals found in low-wage industries such
as agribusiness (only one agribusiness deal made the Investment
100 -- a huge, $350 million, 2,300-employee hog processing
plant in Moore County, Tex.), textiles and apparel (one deal
from that sector made this year's I-100) or furniture (no
deals from that sector).
The early years of the SB&D Investment 100 and Job 100
saw a rash of chicken plants, textile deals, apparel announcements
and mobile home manufacturers. Those types of deals are now
gone from the exclusive SB&D 100. In fact, for all practical
purposes, many of them are gone to China and other offshore
countries.
In their place are big investments made in automotive, biotech,
oil and gas, financial services, steel products, health care
and distribution. The Automotive sector led all industry categories
with 14 big deals making this year's investment 100 and six
more smaller deals making the "just missed deal"
list. In addition to the aforementioned industry sectors,
chemicals faired well, as did food products, wood products
and plastics.
Not showing well on this year's Investment 100 once again
is the semiconductor industry. What was to be one of the South's
premier potential industries way back in the mid-1990s, can
now be labeled a bust. Aviation and aerospace also was missing
on this year's big investment list. Only one deal made the
Investment 100 and no aerospace or aviation deals landed on
the JMD side. Printing and publishing, media, telecom, information
technology and electronics had poor years as well.
Is NAFTA Weeding Out the Crud and Luring the Cream?
The cover story of this magazine's Winter 2001/2002 edition,
reported that Ross Perot's theory that the passage of the
North American Free Trade Act would bring a "giant sucking
sound" of jobs leaving the U.S. in droves was, at the
time, correct. In 2001 alone the South lost over 300,000 net
manufacturing jobs. Most of those jobs, however, came from
low-wage manufacturing industries such as those found in wood
products, agribusiness, textiles and apparel.
At the time, high-wage manufacturing deals were showing in
the South, but not in great numbers. So, like we always do,
we went out on a limb and agreed with Perot's theory. There
was no doubt that NAFTA wasn't treating the South very well
in 2001. In fact, if anything, the South, especially its rural
regions, was getting hammered by what the passage of NAFTA
had brought in the late 1990s and the first two years of the
21st century. It should be noted that NAFTA was passed and
signed by none other than Bill Clinton. It should also be
noted that George Bush supported the passage of NAFTA as well,
but couldn't get it passed by the time he left office in 1993.
While we were slamming NAFTA just 18 months ago, we have
now changed our view. In fact, if we simply looked at a few
clues such as huge deals turned by Michelin, Honda, Nissan
and other foreign companies from 1998 to 2001, we would have
realized what calendar year 2002 has clearly told us through
this list of big investment deals. In just the last few years,
NAFTA has created an environment where many of the South's
low-wage industries have closed, picked up their gear and
headed to some foreign locale. But on the flip side, those
same foreign lands have sent the American South their best,
largest and most important high-wage investment deals. And
why not? The U.S. consumer is their No. 1 target and the South
is by far the best place in the U.S. in which to profit, especially
for a manufacturer. It simply costs less to produce products
here than in the Northeast, Midwest or West. That being the
case, we'll give Perot his due, albeit, his "giant sucking
sound" theory lasted only a few years in the South. We
firmly believe now that NAFTA has weeded out the crud and
brought out the cream. And 2002 is the first year to clearly
indicate that since NAFTA was passed.
2003 SB&D Investment 100: The States
If you read the SB&D Job 100, you'll remember that small
states in the South (under 5 million in population) performed
well in 2002, while some large Southern states saw their big
job deals fall to record lows. That trend continued with this,
the 2003 SB&D Investment 100. In fact, for the first time
in SB&D 100 history, the South's small states turned more
big investment deals than large Southern states. The combined
SB&D Investment 100 and SB&D Investment JMD lists
include deals of $30 million or more. This year, small states
turned 87 deals of announced investments of $30 million or
more. Large states, for the first time, settled to second
place with 80 deals with $30 million or more in investment.
Recent years show just how significant 2002 was for the South's
small and large states alike. In 2001, large states rung up
136 big investments, while small Southern states turned 106
SB&D I-100 and Investment JMD announcements. That's about
the same ratio for years' 2000 and 1999. However, 1998's list
of big investments made in the South showed what most of the
1990s was like: 143 big investment deals announced in large
Southern states and 69 announced in the small states, or about
a two-to-one ratio in favor of the South's largest states
such as Texas, Florida, Georgia and Virginia, among others.
That 10-year run by the South's largest states has now ended.
The 2003 SB&D Investment 100, combined with the Investment
JMD list, shows that every small Southern state outperformed
its 11-year average except for Arkansas, Kentucky and Louisiana.
In contrast, almost every large Southern state performed below
its average. Missouri was the only large Southern state out
of a total of eight that saw its big investment deals increase
beyond its average. Note Texas' performance in calendar year
2002 compared to its 11-year average in the adjoining chart
No. 2.
Chart No. 2
2003 SB&D Investment 100
Deals $30 Million-Plus vs. 11-Year Average
(bold indicates large Southern states)
| |
2003 |
Average |
| Alabama |
15 |
11.8 |
| Arkansas |
2 |
2.7 |
| Florida |
12 |
17.8 |
| Georgia |
12 |
16.2 |
| **Kansas |
6 |
4.8 |
| Kentucky |
9 |
12.2 |
| Louisiana |
15 |
17.4 |
| **Maryland |
0 |
2.2 |
| Mississippi |
9 |
8.5 |
| **Missouri |
11 |
5.8 |
| North Carolina |
8 |
19.6 |
| *Oklahoma |
8 |
7.0 |
| South Carolina |
13 |
10.4 |
| Tennessee |
9 |
11.4 |
| Texas |
18 |
47.2 |
| Virginia |
11 |
19.6 |
| *West Virginia |
10 |
5.2 |
*Seven-year average
**Five-year average
We'll save you some math time by revealing that in the last
decade, large Southern states have averaged a 64 percent take
of all deals $30 million or more announced in the South since
1992, while smaller states in the South made do with 36 percent.
This year, the South's little ones rung up 52 percent of all
deals announced in the South of $30 million in investment
or more, with large states totaling just 48 percent.
lee@sb-d.com
|
|